Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] arm64: tegra210: Add XUSB powergates
From: Thierry Reding
Date: Thu Jun 30 2016 - 06:21:04 EST
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 05:07:15PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 29/06/16 16:56, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:30:08PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28/06/16 12:20, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>> The Tegra210 XUSB subsystem has 3 power partitions which are XUSBA
> >>> (super-speed logic), XUSBB (USB device logic) and XUSBC (USB host
> >>> logic). Populate the device-tree nodes for these XUSB partitions.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
> >>> index 65b829b762bb..efb0fd98b789 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
> >>> @@ -670,6 +670,30 @@
> >>> <&tegra_car TEGRA210_CLK_MIPI_CAL>;
> >>> #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> >>> };
> >>> +
> >>> + pd_xusbss: xusba {
> >>> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA210_CLK_XUSB_SS>;
> >>> + clock-names = "xusb_ss";
> >>> + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA210_CLK_XUSB_SS>;
> >>> + reset-names = "xusb_ss";
> >>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> >>> + };
> >>> +
> >>> + pd_xusbdev: xusbb {
> >>> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA210_CLK_XUSB_DEV>;
> >>> + clock-names = "xusb_dev";
> >>> + resets = <&tegra_car 95>;
> >>> + reset-names = "xusb_dev";
> >>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> >>> + };
> >>> +
> >>> + pd_xusbhost: xusbc {
> >>> + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA210_CLK_XUSB_HOST>;
> >>> + clock-names = "xusb_host";
> >>> + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA210_CLK_XUSB_HOST>;
> >>> + reset-names = "xusb_host";
> >>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> >>> + };
> >>> };
> >>> };
> >>
> >> The 'clock-names' and 'reset-names' nodes are not used/required and so I
> >> will remove these.
> >
> > Please keep them and make use of the names. We used to not do this in
> > the past, and then things became tricky to describe in the DT bindings
> > in order to keep backwards-compatibility.
>
> Unfortunately, in order to use them, we would need to keep a list of all
> the clock and reset names in the PMC driver which would be huge.
That's a Linux driver implementation detail, so it shouldn't influence
the binding.
> > Though perhaps you're not using them because they are found by index? In
> > that case I think it might still be useful to have them for consistency.
>
> Right, we just iterate over the number of the clocks and resets found
> when we initialise the powergate.
Again, that's a driver implementation detail.
> > If you keep them, you might want to turn the _ into -.
>
> I can keep them, however, in other patches I have sent out, for example
> the SOR powergate (part of the DPAUX series) and Audio powergate, they
> do not have them. So I thought I would remove them here to be
> consistent. However, we could add them for these other powergates as well.
Yes, I'd prefer them to be listed in all nodes for documentation, if for
nothing else.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature