Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform
From: Matthias Brugger
Date: Sat Jul 02 2016 - 12:33:57 EST
On 05/16/2016 11:28 AM, James Liao wrote:
Refine scpsys driver common code to support multiple SoC / platform.
Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 363 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 220 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index 57e781c..5870a24 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -11,17 +11,15 @@
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*/
#include <linux/clk.h>
-#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
-#include <linux/regmap.h>
-#include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
+
#include <dt-bindings/power/mt8173-power.h>
#define SPM_VDE_PWR_CON 0x0210
@@ -34,6 +32,7 @@
#define SPM_MFG_2D_PWR_CON 0x02c0
#define SPM_MFG_ASYNC_PWR_CON 0x02c4
#define SPM_USB_PWR_CON 0x02cc
+
#define SPM_PWR_STATUS 0x060c
#define SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND 0x0610
@@ -55,12 +54,12 @@
#define PWR_STATUS_USB BIT(25)
enum clk_id {
- MT8173_CLK_NONE,
- MT8173_CLK_MM,
- MT8173_CLK_MFG,
- MT8173_CLK_VENC,
- MT8173_CLK_VENC_LT,
- MT8173_CLK_MAX,
+ CLK_NONE,
+ CLK_MM,
+ CLK_MFG,
+ CLK_VENC,
+ CLK_VENC_LT,
+ CLK_MAX,
};
#define MAX_CLKS 2
@@ -76,98 +75,6 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
bool active_wakeup;
};
-static const struct scp_domain_data scp_domain_data[] = {
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC] = {
- .name = "vdec",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_VDEC,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_VDE_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_MM},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_VENC] = {
- .name = "venc",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_VENC,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_VEN_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_MM, MT8173_CLK_VENC},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_ISP] = {
- .name = "isp",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_ISP,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_ISP_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(13, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_MM},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_MM] = {
- .name = "mm",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_DISP,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_DIS_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_MM},
- .bus_prot_mask = MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M0 |
- MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M1,
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_VENC_LT] = {
- .name = "venc_lt",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_VENC_LT,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_VEN2_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_MM, MT8173_CLK_VENC_LT},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_AUDIO] = {
- .name = "audio",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_AUDIO,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_AUDIO_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_NONE},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_USB] = {
- .name = "usb",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_USB,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_USB_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(15, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_NONE},
- .active_wakeup = true,
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_ASYNC] = {
- .name = "mfg_async",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_MFG_ASYNC,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_MFG_ASYNC_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = 0,
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_MFG},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_2D] = {
- .name = "mfg_2d",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_MFG_2D,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_MFG_2D_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(13, 12),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_NONE},
- },
- [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG] = {
- .name = "mfg",
- .sta_mask = PWR_STATUS_MFG,
- .ctl_offs = SPM_MFG_PWR_CON,
- .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(13, 8),
- .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(21, 16),
- .clk_id = {MT8173_CLK_NONE},
- .bus_prot_mask = MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_S |
- MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M0 |
- MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M1 |
- MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_SNOOP_OUT,
- },
-};
-
-#define NUM_DOMAINS ARRAY_SIZE(scp_domain_data)
-
struct scp;
struct scp_domain {
@@ -179,7 +86,7 @@ struct scp_domain {
};
struct scp {
- struct scp_domain domains[NUM_DOMAINS];
+ struct scp_domain *domains;
struct genpd_onecell_data pd_data;
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *base;
@@ -408,57 +315,69 @@ static bool scpsys_active_wakeup(struct device *dev)
return scpd->data->active_wakeup;
}
-static int scpsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static void init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk *clk[CLK_MAX])
+{
+ enum clk_id clk_ids[] = {
+ CLK_MM,
+ CLK_MFG,
+ CLK_VENC,
+ CLK_VENC_LT
+ };
+
+ static const char * const clk_names[] = {
+ "mm",
+ "mfg",
+ "venc",
+ "venc_lt",
+ };
+
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(clk_ids); i++)
+ clk[clk_ids[i]] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, clk_names[i]);
We can use the global enum clk_id and stat with i = 1, right?
+}
+
+static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data, int num)
{
struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data;
struct resource *res;
- int i, j, ret;
+ int i, j;
struct scp *scp;
- struct clk *clk[MT8173_CLK_MAX];
+ struct clk *clk[CLK_MAX];
scp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!scp)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
scp->dev = &pdev->dev;
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
scp->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
if (IS_ERR(scp->base))
- return PTR_ERR(scp->base);
-
- pd_data = &scp->pd_data;
-
- pd_data->domains = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
- sizeof(*pd_data->domains) * NUM_DOMAINS, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pd_data->domains)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- clk[MT8173_CLK_MM] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mm");
- if (IS_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_MM]))
- return PTR_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_MM]);
-
- clk[MT8173_CLK_MFG] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mfg");
- if (IS_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_MFG]))
- return PTR_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_MFG]);
-
- clk[MT8173_CLK_VENC] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "venc");
- if (IS_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_VENC]))
- return PTR_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_VENC]);
-
- clk[MT8173_CLK_VENC_LT] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "venc_lt");
- if (IS_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_VENC_LT]))
- return PTR_ERR(clk[MT8173_CLK_VENC_LT]);
+ return ERR_CAST(scp->base);
scp->infracfg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
"infracfg");
if (IS_ERR(scp->infracfg)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot find infracfg controller: %ld\n",
PTR_ERR(scp->infracfg));
- return PTR_ERR(scp->infracfg);
+ return ERR_CAST(scp->infracfg);
}
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_DOMAINS; i++) {
+ scp->domains = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(*scp->domains) * num, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!scp->domains)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ pd_data = &scp->pd_data;
+
+ pd_data->domains = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(*pd_data->domains) * num, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pd_data->domains)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
struct scp_domain *scpd = &scp->domains[i];
const struct scp_domain_data *data = &scp_domain_data[i];
@@ -467,28 +386,54 @@ static int scpsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (PTR_ERR(scpd->supply) == -ENODEV)
scpd->supply = NULL;
else
- return PTR_ERR(scpd->supply);
+ return ERR_CAST(scpd->supply);
}
}
- pd_data->num_domains = NUM_DOMAINS;
+ pd_data->num_domains = num;
- for (i = 0; i < NUM_DOMAINS; i++) {
+ init_clks(pdev, clk);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
struct scp_domain *scpd = &scp->domains[i];
struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = &scpd->genpd;
const struct scp_domain_data *data = &scp_domain_data[i];
+ for (j = 0; j < MAX_CLKS && data->clk_id[j]; j++) {
+ struct clk *c = clk[data->clk_id[j]];
+
+ if (IS_ERR(c)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: clk unavailable\n",
+ data->name);
+ return ERR_CAST(c);
+ }
+
+ scpd->clk[j] = c;
Put this in the else branch. Apart from that is there any reason you
moved the for up in the function? If not, I would prefer not to move it,
to make it easier to read the diff.
Apart from that, the patch looks good to me.
Sorry for the delay in responding.
Matthias