[PATCH 05/10] phy: rockchip-usb: should be a child device of the GRF
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Date: Tue Jul 05 2016 - 01:25:35 EST
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
The usb-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF).
Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate
platform-device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the
simply-mfd mechanism.
As the usb-phy is part of the kernel for some releases now, we keep
the old (and now deprecated) binding for compatibility purposes.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-usb-phy.txt | 27 ++++++++++++--------
drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c | 15 ++++++++---
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-usb-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-usb-phy.txt
index 68498d5..cc6be96 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-usb-phy.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-usb-phy.txt
@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@ Required properties:
"rockchip,rk3066a-usb-phy"
"rockchip,rk3188-usb-phy"
"rockchip,rk3288-usb-phy"
- - rockchip,grf : phandle to the syscon managing the "general
- register files"
- #address-cells: should be 1
- #size-cells: should be 0
+Deprecated properties:
+ - rockchip,grf : phandle to the syscon managing the "general
+ register files" - phy should be a child of the GRF instead
+
Sub-nodes:
Each PHY should be represented as a sub-node.
@@ -28,14 +30,19 @@ Optional Properties:
Example:
-usbphy: phy {
- compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-usb-phy";
- rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
+grf: syscon@ff770000 {
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
+
+...
+
+ usbphy: phy {
+ compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-usb-phy";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
- usbphy0: usb-phy0 {
- #phy-cells = <0>;
- reg = <0x320>;
+ usbphy0: usb-phy0 {
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0x320>;
+ };
};
};
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c
index d60b149..e66b5bf 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-usb.c
@@ -397,8 +397,13 @@ static int rockchip_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
phy_base->pdata = match->data;
phy_base->dev = dev;
- phy_base->reg_base = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
- "rockchip,grf");
+ phy_base->reg_base = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ if (dev->parent && dev->parent->of_node)
+ phy_base->reg_base = syscon_node_to_regmap(
+ dev->parent->of_node);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy_base->reg_base))
+ phy_base->reg_base = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(
+ dev->of_node, "rockchip,grf");
if (IS_ERR(phy_base->reg_base)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing rockchip,grf property\n");
return PTR_ERR(phy_base->reg_base);
@@ -463,7 +468,11 @@ static int __init rockchip_init_usb_uart(void)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
- grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "rockchip,grf");
+ grf = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+ if (np->parent)
+ grf = syscon_node_to_regmap(np->parent);
+ if (IS_ERR(grf))
+ grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "rockchip,grf");
if (IS_ERR(grf)) {
pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property, %lu\n",
__func__, PTR_ERR(grf));
--
1.7.9.5