Re: [RFC PATCH] tracing: add sched_prio_update

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:53:24 -0400
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 
> > I'm not convinced this should be needed. I hate adding back to back
> > tracepoints.  
> 
> Indeed, having two tracepoints back to back is not pretty. We placed it
> here to get the priority of the newly created threads. Maybe a more
> appropriate way of doing that would be to extend the sched_process_fork
> tracepoint to output the same scheduling informations. Would you prefer
> that option ?

That may be a possibility. Let's see what Peter thinks.

-- Steve