Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] perf: util: only open events on CPUs an evsel permits

[Jiri Olsa]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:04:34PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> In systems with heterogeneous CPU PMUs, it's possible for each evsel to
> cover a distinct set of CPUs, and hence the cpu_map associated with each
> evsel may have a distinct idx<->id mapping. Any of these may be distinct from
> the evlist's cpu map.
> 
> Events can be tied to the same fd so long as they use the same per-cpu
> ringbuffer (i.e. so long as they are on the same CPU). To acquire the
> correct FDs, we must compare the Linux logical IDs rather than the evsel
> or evlist indices.
> 
> This path adds logic to perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel to handle this,
> translating IDs as required. As PMUs may cover a subset of CPUs from the
> evlist, we skip the CPUs a PMU cannot handle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index e82ba90..0b5b1be 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -984,17 +984,24 @@ static int __perf_evlist__mmap(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
>  }
>  
>  static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx,
> -				       struct mmap_params *mp, int cpu,
> +				       struct mmap_params *mp, int cpu_idx,
>  				       int thread, int *output)
>  {
>  	struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> +	int evlist_cpu = cpu_map__cpu(evlist->cpus, cpu_idx);
>  
>  	evlist__for_each(evlist, evsel) {
>  		int fd;
> +		int cpu;
>  
>  		if (evsel->system_wide && thread)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (!cpu_map__has(evsel->cpus, evlist_cpu))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		cpu = cpu_map__idx(evsel->cpus, evlist_cpu);

you basicaly call cpu_map__idx twice in here,
I think it might be better call it just once
and check the cpu for -1

jirka