Re: [PATCH] Staging: gdm724x: gdm_tty: Fixed a checkpatch check issue.

[Luis de Bethencourt]

On 08/07/16 20:32, Samuele Baisi wrote:
> 
> 
> Il giorno ven 8 lug 2016 alle 20:17, Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>> On 05/07/16 12:33, Samuele Baisi wrote:
>>>  Removed a blankline after an opening bracket.
>>>
>>>  Signed-off-by: Samuele Baisi <ciccio87@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>  ---
>>>   drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 1 -
>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>>  diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
>>>  index eb7e252..ae39663 100644
>>>  --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
>>>  +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
>>>  @@ -225,7 +225,6 @@ int register_lte_tty_device(struct tty_dev *tty_dev, struct device *device)
>>>       int j;
>>>
>>>       for (i = 0; i < TTY_MAX_COUNT; i++) {
>>>  -
>>>           gdm = kmalloc(sizeof(*gdm), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>           if (!gdm)
>>>               return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>
>> Patch applies cleanly and removes the checkpath issue.
>>
>> Acked-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Samuele,
>>
>> It is a good idea to include the issue you are solving in the commit
>> message, in this case it would be:
>>
>> Removed a blankline after an opening bracket.
>>
>> CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
>> #228: FILE: drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c:228:
>> +       for (i = 0; i < TTY_MAX_COUNT; i++) {
>> +
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
>> ---
>>
>> Thanks :)
>> Luis
> 
> Ok, next time I'll try to be more clear.
> 
> Thank you very much and best regards.
> 
> Samuele
> 

No problem Samuele.

Looking forward to more patches from you soon :)
Feel free to CC me in them.

Luis