On Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:37:20 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote:
+#define IRQ_WDT W90X900_IRQ(1)
+#define IRQ_WWDT W90X900_IRQ(2)
+#define IRQ_LVD W90X900_IRQ(3)
+#define IRQ_EXT0 W90X900_IRQ(4)
+#define IRQ_EXT1 W90X900_IRQ(5)
+#define IRQ_EXT2 W90X900_IRQ(6)
+#define IRQ_EXT3 W90X900_IRQ(7)
+#define IRQ_EXT4 W90X900_IRQ(8)
+#define IRQ_EXT5 W90X900_IRQ(9)
+#define IRQ_EXT6 W90X900_IRQ(10)
I'd suggest dropping the list, the contents are now in the dts.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-aic.h b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-aic.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a77016
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/nuc970-regs-aic.h
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_REGS_AIC_H
+#define __ASM_ARCH_REGS_AIC_H
+
+/*NUC970 AIC regs*/
+
+#define REG_AIC_SCR1 0x00
+#define REG_AIC_SCR2 0x04
+#define REG_AIC_SCR3 0x08
+#define REG_AIC_SCR4 0x0C
+#define REG_AIC_SCR5 0x10
And like the clk driver, these should all be in the irqchip driver instead
of a separate header.
+
+static void __iomem *aic_base;
+static struct irq_domain *aic_domain;
+#define MAKE_HWIRQ(irqnum) (irqnum)
The macro appears to be unused.
+static void nuc970_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ if (d->irq < 32)
+ __raw_writel(1 << (d->irq), aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCR);
+ else
+ __raw_writel(1 << (d->irq - 32), aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCRH);
+}
writel()
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel