Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clockevents tree with the arm-soc tree
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Jul 11 2016 - 01:28:34 EST
Hi all,
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:12:26 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the clockevents tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> c86f51737f8d ("ARM: clps711x: Switch to MULTIPLATFORM")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> 250e46aa3bb3 ("clocksource/drivers/clps_711x: Add the COMPILE_TEST option")
>
> from the clockevents tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the arm-soc version of this file and then added
> the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:59:06 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/clps_711x: fixup for "ARM: clps711x: Switch to MULTIPLATFORM"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-clps711x/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/Kconfig
> index 3b56197ccfd0..dc7c6edeab39 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-clps711x/Kconfig
> @@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ menuconfig ARCH_CLPS711X
> depends on ARCH_MULTI_V4T
> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> select AUTO_ZRELADDR
> - select CLKSRC_MMIO
> select CLKSRC_OF
> + select CLPS711X_TIMER
> select COMMON_CLK
> select CPU_ARM720T
> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> --
> 2.8.1
This merge fix is now applicable to the merge between the arm-soc tree
and the tip tree.
Also, the clockevents tree needs to be cleaned up as all its commits
have been added to the tip tree as different commits (but the same
patches) :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell