Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: clear wlen field while setting word length.

[Vignesh R]

On Monday 11 July 2016 02:49 PM, prahlad venkata wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
>>>>>>>> index 29ea8d2..6c61f54 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ static int qspi_write_msg(struct ti_qspi *qspi, struct spi_transfer *t,
>>>>>>>>                               cmd |= QSPI_WLEN(QSPI_WLEN_MAX_BITS);
>>>>>>>>                       } else {
>>>>>>>>                               writeb(*txbuf, qspi->base + QSPI_SPI_DATA_REG);
>>>>>>>> -                             cmd = qspi->cmd | QSPI_WR_SNGL;
>>>>>
>>>>> This is wrong. Deleting this line means QSPI_WR_SNGL is not set and no
>>>>> data is sent out on the wire.
>>>> QSPI_WR_SNGL is already set as soon as we enter the function.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> qspi->cmd always has WLEN field cleared and set to WLEN = 1 byte (see
>>>>>>> ti_qspi_start_transfer_one()). And hence variable 'cmd' will also have
>>>>>>> WLEN set to 1 byte.
>>>>>> Even though WLEN=1 is set in the ti_qspi_transfer_one, if we ask for a
>>>>>> transfer of large data,
>>>>>> say 300 bytes in length, for attaining faster data rate WLEN 128 is
>>>>>> selected for the first two
>>>>>> transactions and remaining 44 bytes will be transmitted with WLEN 1.
>>>>>> During that case,
>>>>>> WLEN will be changed inside qspi_write_msg function itself and the
>>>>>> field should be cleared
>>>>>> first while doing that.
>>>>>
>>>>> In qspi_write_msg(), qspi->cmd will always have WLEN set to
>>>>> QSPI_WLEN(t->bits_per_word) and qspi->cmd is never changed within this
>>>>> function.
>>>>> It is the value of local variable 'cmd' that is changed to appropriate
>>>>> WLEN (128bit or 8bit) as necessary.
>>
>>> 'cmd' is written back to qspi->cmd for every transaction.
>>
>> You mean qspi->cmd = cmd ?
>> I don't see this happening anywhere in the driver. Can you point me to
>> that line of code?
> line 296:
> ti_qspi_write(qspi, cmd, QSPI_SPI_CMD_REG);

Sorry, I don't understand. QSPI_SPI_CMD_REG and qspi->cmd are different.
qspi->cmd does not represent the QSPI_SPI_CMD_REG register. qspi->cmd is
just local driver data for book-keeping.

Please add some prints in driver to see how 'cmd' (and qspi->cmd)
variable changes in case of 128bit mode and 8bit mode.

Regards
Vignesh


-- 
Regards
Vignesh