Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: add support for the IOMMU_PRIV flag

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Mon Jul 11 2016 - 10:14:31 EST


On 09/07/16 03:09, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> From: Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Allow the creation of privileged mode mappings, for stage 1 only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Gebben <jgebben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> index a1ed1b73fed4..e9e7dd179708 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@
> ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTR_HI_MASK)
>
> /* Stage-1 PTE */
> -#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_UNPRIV (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 6)
> -#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY (((arm_lpae_iopte)2) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RW (((arm_lpae_iopte)0) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RW (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RO (((arm_lpae_iopte)2) << 6)
> +#define ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RO (((arm_lpae_iopte)3) << 6)

I'd much rather keep the existing per-bit definitions and compose them
in the code below (which by the look of it should then become a simple
one-liner of making the OR-ing in of AP_UNPRIV conditional.)

Robin.

> #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT 2
> #define ARM_LPAE_PTE_nG (((arm_lpae_iopte)1) << 11)
>
> @@ -350,10 +352,14 @@ static arm_lpae_iopte arm_lpae_prot_to_pte(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
>
> if (data->iop.fmt == ARM_64_LPAE_S1 ||
> data->iop.fmt == ARM_32_LPAE_S1) {
> - pte = ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_UNPRIV | ARM_LPAE_PTE_nG;
> + pte = ARM_LPAE_PTE_nG;
>
> - if (!(prot & IOMMU_WRITE) && (prot & IOMMU_READ))
> - pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RDONLY;
> + if (prot & IOMMU_WRITE)
> + pte |= (prot & IOMMU_PRIV) ? ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RW
> + : ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RW;
> + else
> + pte |= (prot & IOMMU_PRIV) ? ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_PRIV_RO
> + : ARM_LPAE_PTE_AP_RO;
>
> if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO)
> pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV
>