On 11/07/16 11:50, David Vrabel wrote:ok, I will send a new patch : )
On 11/07/16 10:33, Juergen Gross wrote:Yeah, probably as the first action in scsifront_do_request().
On 11/07/16 04:51, Bin Wu wrote:Would it make more sense to advance req_prod_pvt only if the request has
During scsi command queueing, if mapping data fails, we need toWell spotted. There is another instance of this problem in
reclaim the failed request. Otherwise, the garbage request will
be pushed into the ring for the backend to work.
scsifront_action_handler(). Would you mind correcting this one, too?
been successfully created?
Juergen
David
Signed-off-by: Bin Wu <wu.wubin@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
index 9dc8687..655163d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/xen-scsifront.c
@@ -565,6 +565,7 @@ static int scsifront_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host
*shost,
err = map_data_for_request(info, sc, ring_req, shadow);
if (err < 0) {
pr_debug("%s: err %d\n", __func__, err);
+ info->ring.req_prod_pvt--;
scsifront_put_rqid(info, rqid);
scsifront_return(info);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
.