[PATCH RT 16/20] arm: lazy preempt: correct resched condition

[Steven Rostedt]

4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If we get out of preempt_schedule_irq() then we check for NEED_RESCHED
and call the former function again if set because the preemption counter
has be zero at this point.
However the counter for lazy-preempt might not be zero therefore we have
to check the counter before looking at the need_resched_lazy flag.

Cc: stable-rt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
index e0ca45754231..797a13d959b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
@@ -237,7 +237,11 @@ svc_preempt:
 	bne	1b
 	tst	r0, #_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
 	reteq	r8				@ go again
-	b	1b
+	ldr	r0, [tsk, #TI_PREEMPT_LAZY]	@ get preempt lazy count
+	teq	r0, #0				@ if preempt lazy count != 0
+	beq	1b
+	ret	r8				@ go again
+
 #endif
 
 __und_fault:
-- 
2.8.1