Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] irqchip: add irqchip driver for nuc900

From: Jason Cooper
Date: Wed Jul 13 2016 - 16:09:36 EST


Hi Wan Zongshun,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 03:27:22PM +0800, Wan Zongshun wrote:
> This patch is to add irqchip driver support for nuc900 plat,
> current this driver only supports nuc970 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/irqs.h | 5 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-nuc900.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 156 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-nuc900.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/irqs.h b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/irqs.h
> index 9d5cba3..3b035c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/irqs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/include/mach/irqs.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,12 @@
> #define IRQ_KPI W90X900_IRQ(29)
> #define IRQ_P2SGROUP W90X900_IRQ(30)
> #define IRQ_ADC W90X900_IRQ(31)
> +
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_SOC_NUC900)
> #define NR_IRQS (IRQ_ADC+1)
> +#else
> +#define NR_IRQS 62
> +#endif

Arnd already covered this...

>
> /*for irq group*/
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 38853a1..9ccd5af8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -69,3 +69,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PIC32_EVIC) += irq-pic32-evic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MVEBU_ODMI) += irq-mvebu-odmi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LS_SCFG_MSI) += irq-ls-scfg-msi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_EZNPS_GIC) += irq-eznps.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_NUC970) += irq-nuc900.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-nuc900.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nuc900.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c4b2e39
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-nuc900.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2016 Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> + *
> + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/exception.h>
> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
> +
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR1 0x00
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR2 0x04
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR3 0x08
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR4 0x0C
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR5 0x10
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR6 0x14
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR7 0x18
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR8 0x1C
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR9 0x20
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR10 0x24
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR11 0x28
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR12 0x2C
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR13 0x30
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR14 0x34
> +#define REG_AIC_SCR15 0x38
> +#define REG_AIC_IRSR 0x100
> +#define REG_AIC_IRSRH 0x104
> +#define REG_AIC_IASR 0x108
> +#define REG_AIC_IASRH 0x10C
> +#define REG_AIC_ISR 0x110
> +#define REG_AIC_ISRH 0x114
> +#define REG_AIC_IPER 0x118
> +#define REG_AIC_ISNR 0x120
> +#define REG_AIC_OISR 0x124
> +#define REG_AIC_IMR 0x128
> +#define REG_AIC_IMRH 0x12C
> +#define REG_AIC_MECR 0x130
> +#define REG_AIC_MECRH 0x134
> +#define REG_AIC_MDCR 0x138
> +#define REG_AIC_MDCRH 0x13C
> +#define REG_AIC_SSCR 0x140
> +#define REG_AIC_SSCRH 0x144
> +#define REG_AIC_SCCR 0x148
> +#define REG_AIC_SCCRH 0x14C
> +#define REG_AIC_EOSCR 0x150

Please remove unused defines.

> +
> +static void __iomem *aic_base;
> +static struct irq_domain *aic_domain;
> +
> +static void nuc900_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + if (d->irq < 32)
> + writel(1 << (d->irq), aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCR);
> + else
> + writel(1 << (d->irq - 32), aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCRH);
> +}
> +
> +static void nuc900_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + writel(0x01, aic_base + REG_AIC_EOSCR);
> +}
> +
> +static void nuc900_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + if (d->irq < 32)
> + writel(1 << (d->irq), aic_base + REG_AIC_MECR);
> + else
> + writel(1 << (d->irq - 32), aic_base + REG_AIC_MECRH);
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_chip nuc900_irq_chip = {
> + .irq_ack = nuc900_irq_ack,
> + .irq_mask = nuc900_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = nuc900_irq_unmask,
> +};
> +
> +void __exception_irq_entry aic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + u32 hwirq;
> +
> + hwirq = readl(aic_base + REG_AIC_IPER);
> + hwirq = readl(aic_base + REG_AIC_ISNR);
> + if (!hwirq)
> + writel(0x01, aic_base + REG_AIC_EOSCR);

Could you explain what's going on here?

> +
> + handle_IRQ((irq_find_mapping(aic_domain, hwirq)), regs);
> +}
> +
> +static int aic_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &nuc900_irq_chip, handle_level_irq);
> + irq_clear_status_flags(virq, IRQ_NOREQUEST);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct irq_domain_ops aic_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = aic_irq_domain_map,
> + .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init aic_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + aic_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + if (!aic_base) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + pr_err("%s: unable to map registers\n", node->full_name);
> + goto err_iomap;
> + }
> +
> + writel(0xFFFFFFFC, aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCR);
> + writel(0xFFFFFFFF, aic_base + REG_AIC_MDCRH);
> +
> + aic_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, NR_IRQS,
> + &aic_irq_domain_ops, NULL);
> +
> + if (!aic_domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + pr_err("%s: unable to create IRQ domain\n", node->full_name);
> + goto err_aic_domain;
> + }
> +
> + set_handle_irq(aic_handle_irq);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_aic_domain:
> + iounmap(aic_base);
> +err_iomap:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(nuc900, "nuvoton,nuc900-aic", aic_of_init);

afaict, there is no 'nuc900', that's a family. If so, this compatible
needs to be 'nuvoton,nuc970-aic'.

thx,

Jason.