Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] rtc: ac100: Add clk output support

From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Wed Jul 13 2016 - 23:35:13 EST


On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Michael Turquette
<mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2016-06-30 08:58:48)
>> +static long ac100_clkout_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> + unsigned long prate)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long best_rate = 0, tmp_rate, tmp_prate;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (prate == AC100_RTC_32K_RATE)
>> + return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &prate, NULL,
>> + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH,
>> + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; ac100_clkout_prediv[i].div; i++) {
>> + tmp_prate = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, ac100_clkout_prediv[i].val);
>> + tmp_rate = divider_round_rate(hw, rate, &tmp_prate, NULL,
>> + AC100_CLKOUT_DIV_WIDTH,
>> + CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO);
>> +
>> + if (tmp_rate > rate)
>> + continue;
>> + if (rate - tmp_rate < best_rate - tmp_rate)
>> + best_rate = tmp_rate;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return best_rate;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ac100_clkout_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_hw *best_parent;
>> + unsigned long best = 0;
>> + int i, num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
>> + struct clk_hw *parent = clk_hw_get_parent_by_index(hw, i);
>> + unsigned long tmp, prate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent);
>> +
>> + tmp = ac100_clkout_round_rate(hw, req->rate, prate);
>> +
>> + if (tmp > req->rate)
>> + continue;
>> + if (req->rate - tmp < req->rate - best) {
>> + best = tmp;
>> + best_parent = parent;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!best)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + req->best_parent_hw = best_parent;
>> + req->best_parent_rate = best;
>> + req->rate = best;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> You only need one of the two functions above. Keep the .determine_rate
> callback and drop .round_rate.

Only .round_rate is set in the clk_ops. ac100_clkout_round_rate just
serves to split out some of the calculations done per parent.

> Otherwise the rest of the clk support looks great to me. Feel free to
> add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

ChenYu