Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes

[Paul Gortmaker]

[Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes] On 14/07/2016 (Thu 15:04) Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > To that end, I have done allmodconfig, allyesconfig and allnoconfig
> > for both 32 bit and 64 bit x86 with these changes on the linux-next
> > from today, which presumably has an up to date copy of tip in it.
> 
> It does, still I get this on allnoconfig with your patches applied:

Took me a while to figure out why I didn't see this; I was able to
finally reproduce it on x86-32 with allnoconfig but CONFIG_SMP=y.

> 
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c: In function âsetup_percpu_segmentâ:
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:159:2: error: implicit declaration of function 
> âpack_descriptorâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   pack_descriptor(&gdt, per_cpu_offset(cpu), 0xFFFFF,
>   ^
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:162:2: error: implicit declaration of function 
> âwrite_gdt_entryâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   write_gdt_entry(get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu),
>   ^
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c:162:18: error: implicit declaration of function 
> âget_cpu_gdt_tableâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   write_gdt_entry(get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu),

All three of these guys live in asm/desc.h and adding that to the top of
arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c asm include list seems to fix the
reproducer I now have here.

> 
> I'll continue testing with the setup_percpu.c change left out.

Let me know if you want a resend or if you want to just add the
asm/desc.h locally or ...

Paul.
--

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo