Re: [PATCH v7 5/9] MAINTAINERS / ACPI: add the ARM64-specific ACPI Support maintainers

From: Fu Wei
Date: Thu Jul 14 2016 - 21:02:54 EST


Hi Rafael,

On 14 July 2016 at 04:16, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM, <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch add the ARM64-specific ACPI Support maintainers in
>> MAINTAINERS, according to the discussion on mailing list:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/29/580
>> Lorenzo Pieralisi will submit the pull requsts.
>>
>> The maintainers are listed by the alphabet order of
>> their name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 1209323..1e03463 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -315,6 +315,14 @@ W: https://01.org/linux-acpi
>> S: Supported
>> F: drivers/acpi/fan.c
>>
>> +ACPI FOR ARM64 (ACPI/arm64)
>> +M: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> +M: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
>> +M: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
>> +L: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: drivers/acpi/arm64
>> +
>> ACPI THERMAL DRIVER
>> M: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>> L: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> --
>
> This patch should not be part of your series.
>
> I would prefer it if Hanjun, Lorenzo or Sudeep sent it.

Sorry for that, This won't be in my patchset next time.

>
> Of course, it doesn't make much sense to send it before creating
> drivers/acpi/arm64/ and putting something in there, so it should be
> sent separately after the series has been merged.

yes, you are right , got it , thanks :-)

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael



--
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat