Re: [PATCH v7 4/9] acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, July 15, 2016 03:32:35 PM Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> 
> 
> On 14 July 2016 at 04:30, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:53 PM,  <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> This patch adds support for parsing arch timer in GTDT,
> >> provides some kernel APIs to parse all the PPIs and
> >> always-on info in GTDT and export them.
> >>
> >> By this driver, we can simplify arm_arch_timer drivers, and
> >> separate the ACPI GTDT knowledge from it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig           |   5 ++
> >>  drivers/acpi/Makefile          |   1 +
> >>  drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig     |  15 ++++
> >>  drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile    |   1 +
> >>  drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  include/linux/acpi.h           |   6 ++
> >>  6 files changed, 198 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> >> index b7e2e77..1cdc7d2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> >> @@ -521,4 +521,9 @@ config XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION
> >>
> >>  endif
> >>
> >> +if ARM64
> >> +source "drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig"
> >> +
> >> +endif
> >> +
> >>  endif  # ACPI
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> >> index 251ce85..1a94ff7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> >> @@ -99,5 +99,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_EXTLOG)     += acpi_extlog.o
> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_PMIC_OPREGION)    += pmic/intel_pmic.o
> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_CRC_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_crc.o
> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_XPOWER_PMIC_OPREGION) += pmic/intel_pmic_xpower.o
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64)    += arm64/
> >>
> >>  video-objs                     += acpi_video.o video_detect.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..ff5c253
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> >> +#
> >> +# ACPI Configuration for ARM64
> >> +#
> >> +
> >> +menu "The ARM64-specific ACPI Support"
> >> +
> >> +config ACPI_GTDT
> >> +       bool "ACPI GTDT table Support"
> >
> > This should depend on ARM64.
> >
> > Also I wonder if it needs to be user-selectable?  Wouldn't it be
> > better to enable it by default when building for ARM64 with ACPI?
> >
> >> +       help
> >> +         GTDT (Generic Timer Description Table) provides information
> >> +         for per-processor timers and Platform (memory-mapped) timers
> >> +         for ARM platforms. Select this option to provide information
> >> +         needed for the timers init.
> >> +
> >> +endmenu
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..466de6b
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Makefile
> >> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GTDT)                += acpi_gtdt.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..9ee977d
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/acpi_gtdt.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * ARM Specific GTDT table Support
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2016, Linaro Ltd.
> >> + * Author: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> + *         Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> + *         Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >> +#include <linux/init.h>
> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +
> >> +#include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
> >> +
> >> +#undef pr_fmt
> >> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "GTDT: " fmt
> >
> > I would add "ACPI" to the prefix too if I were you, but that's me.
> 
> good idea, you are right, will do
> 
> >
> >> +
> >> +typedef struct {
> >> +       struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt;
> >> +       void *platform_timer_start;
> >> +       void *gtdt_end;
> >> +} acpi_gtdt_desc_t;
> >> +
> >> +static acpi_gtdt_desc_t acpi_gtdt_desc __initdata;
> >> +
> >> +static inline void *next_platform_timer(void *platform_timer)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
> >> +
> >> +       platform_timer += gh->length;
> >> +       if (platform_timer < acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end)
> >> +               return platform_timer;
> >> +
> >> +       return NULL;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +#define for_each_platform_timer(_g)                            \
> >> +       for (_g = acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start; _g;      \
> >> +            _g = next_platform_timer(_g))
> >> +
> >> +static inline bool is_timer_block(void *platform_timer)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
> >> +
> >> +       if (gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_TIMER_BLOCK)
> >> +               return true;
> >> +
> >> +       return false;
> >
> > This is just too much code.  It would suffice to do
> >
> >     return gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_TIMER_BLOCK;
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline bool is_watchdog(void *platform_timer)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct acpi_gtdt_header *gh = platform_timer;
> >> +
> >> +       if (gh->type == ACPI_GTDT_TYPE_WATCHDOG)
> >> +               return true;
> >> +
> >> +       return false;
> >
> > Just like above.
> 
> 
> Thanks, this is better :-) will do
> 
> 
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Get some basic info from GTDT table, and init the global variables above
> >> + * for all timers initialization of Generic Timer.
> >> + * This function does some validation on GTDT table.
> >> + */
> >> +static int __init acpi_gtdt_desc_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct acpi_table_gtdt *gtdt = container_of(table,
> >> +                                                   struct acpi_table_gtdt,
> >> +                                                   header);
> >> +
> >> +       acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt = gtdt;
> >> +       acpi_gtdt_desc.gtdt_end = (void *)table + table->length;
> >> +
> >> +       if (table->revision < 2) {
> >> +               pr_info("Revision:%d doesn't support Platform Timers.\n",
> >> +                       table->revision);
> >
> > Is it really useful to print this message (and the one below) at the
> > "info" level?  What about changing them to pr_debug()?
> 
> yes, pr_debug is better, thanks :-) will do
> 
> 
> >
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       if (!gtdt->platform_timer_count) {
> >> +               pr_info("No Platform Timer.\n");
> >> +               return 0;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start = (void *)gtdt +
> >> +                                             gtdt->platform_timer_offset;
> >> +       if (acpi_gtdt_desc.platform_timer_start <
> >> +           (void *)table + sizeof(struct acpi_table_gtdt)) {
> >> +               pr_err(FW_BUG "Platform Timer pointer error.\n");
> >
> > Why pr_err()?
> 
> if (true), that means the GTDT table has bugs.
> 

And that's not a very useful piece of information unless you're debugging the
platform, is it?

Thanks,
Rafael