Re: [PATCH] mm: gup: Re-define follow_page_mask output parameter page_mask usage

[Chen Gang]

On 7/13/16 15:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 13-07-16 01:03:10, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 7/12/16 05:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 01:17:05 +0800 chengang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>> For a pure output parameter:
>>>>
>>>>  - When callee fails, the caller should not assume the output parameter
>>>>    is still valid.
>>>>
>>>>  - And callee should not assume the pure output parameter must be
>>>>    provided by caller -- caller has right to pass NULL when caller does
>>>>    not care about it.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't think this one is worth merging really.
>>>
>>
>> OK, thanks, I can understand.
>>
>> It will be better if provide more details: e.g.
>>
>>  - This patch is incorrect, or the comments is not correct.
>>
>>  - The patch is worthless, at present.
> 
> I would say the patch is not really needed. The code you are touching
> works just fine and there is no reason to touch it unless this is a part
> of a larger change where future changes would be easier to
> review/implement.
> 

OK, thanks. I shall try to find other kinds of patches in linux/include,
next.  :-)

-- 
Chen Gang (éå)

Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.