Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "ttm_tt_destroy"

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:28:18PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 20:20:48 +0200
> 
> The ttm_tt_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 39386f5..23809d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_release_list(struct kref *list_kref)
>  	BUG_ON(bo->mem.mm_node != NULL);
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->lru));
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy));
> -
> -	if (bo->ttm)
> -		ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);
> +	tm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);

This doesn't compile. Tsk, pls be more careful, and definitely
compile-test _all_ your changes before hitting send. I've dropped this one
from my queue, the others still look ok.
-Daniel

>  	atomic_dec(&bo->glob->bo_count);
>  	if (bo->resv == &bo->ttm_resv)
>  		reservation_object_fini(&bo->ttm_resv);
> -- 
> 2.9.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch