Re: [PATCH v3] drm/ttm: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "ttm_tt_destroy"

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Mon Jul 18 2016 - 10:45:32 EST


On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:10:36PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 16:06:18 +0200
>
> The ttm_tt_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

When resending pls describe what changed (and why). Also I'd still like
that smatch included in the commit message.
-Daniel

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 39386f5..4e55863 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -146,9 +146,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_release_list(struct kref *list_kref)
> BUG_ON(bo->mem.mm_node != NULL);
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->lru));
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy));
> -
> - if (bo->ttm)
> - ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);
> + ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);
> atomic_dec(&bo->glob->bo_count);
> if (bo->resv == &bo->ttm_resv)
> reservation_object_fini(&bo->ttm_resv);
> --
> 2.9.2
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch