Re: Is: Revert c5ad33184354260be6d05de57e46a5498692f6d6 "mm/swap.c: flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival" from stable tree? Was:[osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd]

[Michal Hocko]

On Tue 19-07-16 10:35:09, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> No such Message-ID known.

Ups, sorry about that. I didn't know that the stable tree is not
archived via lkml.kernel.org. Here is the link
http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg138760.html
 
> Am 19.07.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> > [CCing Sasha]
> > 
> > On Mon 18-07-16 11:30:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Hey Lukasz,
> > > 
> > > We found that your patch in the automated Xen test-case ends up
> > > OOMing the box when trying to install guests. This worked prior
> > > to your patch.
> > > 
> > > See serial log:
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97597/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-pinot0.log
> > > 
> > > Would it be OK to revert this patch from the stable trees?
> > The fix up is trivial so I believe it would be better to apply the
> > follow up fix
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160714175521.3675e3d6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs