Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] bpf: Add bpf_probe_write BPF helper to be called in tracers (kprobes)

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:39:42PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> The example has been modified to act like a test in the follow up set. It tests 
> for the positive case (Did the helper work or not) as opposed to the negative 
> case (is the helper able to violate the safety constraints we set forth)? I 
> could do that as well, in another patch by mprotecting those pages, or some 
> such. Should I add an additional negative test?

That would be awesome, but doesn't have to be in this patch set.
It can be done as a follow up.

Thanks!