Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: iio: vcnl4000: Replace i2c api's with regmap
From: Pratik Prajapati
Date: Mon Jul 25 2016 - 02:20:48 EST
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21/07/16 15:41, Pratik Prajapati wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratik.prajapati12@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c
>> index 1378175..61e48f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4000.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>> #include <linux/i2c.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>> #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>> @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@
>> struct vcnl4000_data {
>> struct i2c_client *client;
>> struct mutex lock;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
> You can use the regmap_get_device to avoid having to carry the client through the whole
> driver. I haven't checked the result of applying this patch but I'm not entirely sure
> you use client at all.
I have used client for devm_regmap_init_i2c() and i2c_set_clientdata()
>> };
>>
>> static const struct i2c_device_id vcnl4000_id[] = {
>> @@ -66,20 +68,20 @@ static int vcnl4000_measure(struct vcnl4000_data *data, u8 req_mask,
>> int tries = 20;
>> __be16 buf;
>> int ret;
>> + unsigned int regval;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
>>
>> - ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, VCNL4000_COMMAND,
>> - req_mask);
>> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, VCNL4000_COMMAND, req_mask);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto fail;
>>
>> /* wait for data to become ready */
>> while (tries--) {
>> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, VCNL4000_COMMAND);
>> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, VCNL4000_COMMAND, ®val);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto fail;
>> - if (ret & rdy_mask)
>> + if (regval & rdy_mask)
>> break;
>> msleep(20); /* measurement takes up to 100 ms */
>> }
>> @@ -91,8 +93,8 @@ static int vcnl4000_measure(struct vcnl4000_data *data, u8 req_mask,
>> goto fail;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(data->client,
>> - data_reg, sizeof(buf), (u8 *) &buf);
>> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, data_reg, (u8 *) &buf,
>> + sizeof(buf));
>> if (ret < 0)
>> goto fail;
>>
>> @@ -131,23 +133,24 @@ static int vcnl4000_write_led_current_raw(struct vcnl4000_data *data, int val)
>> if (val < 0 || val > VCNL4000_LED_CURRENT_MAX)
>> return -ERANGE;
>> mutex_lock(&data->lock);
>> - ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, VCNL4000_LED_CURRENT,
>> - val);
> Just noticed this. You didn't do a masked write in the previous patch.
> Are you sure that wasn't overwriting something it shouldn't have been?
No.
Its overwriting, I will correct that.