Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Mon Jul 25 2016 - 17:46:04 EST

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build
> problem, the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build
> failure in linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency).
> After the build failed, I started including the perf tree directly
> before the tip tree and the build would fail when I merged that ...

Ugh. It's merged in my tree now, because I thought it was ok. Can
somebody point me to the fix?