Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Jul 26 2016 - 02:46:01 EST

* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > That is why I sent this without mentioning the conflict. Is there any other
> > > complication that I missed?
> >
> > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build problem,
> > the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build failure in
> > linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency). After the build failed,
> > I started including the perf tree directly before the tip tree and the build
> > would fail when I merged that ...
> Now that this is fixed and merged into the tip tree, I have removed the perf
> tree from linux-next.

Ok, thanks - and sorry about this - I'll get the tooling fixes to Linus ASAP.