Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v4.8

[Ingo Molnar]

* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > That is why I sent this without mentioning the conflict. Is there any other 
> > > complication that I missed?
> > 
> > Actually, the perf tree on its own was enough to trigger the build problem, 
> > the luto-next tree was just what initially triggered the build failure in 
> > linux-next (I guess there is some missing dependency). After the build failed, 
> > I started including the perf tree directly before the tip tree and the build 
> > would fail when I merged that ...
> 
> Now that this is fixed and merged into the tip tree, I have removed the perf 
> tree from linux-next.

Ok, thanks - and sorry about this - I'll get the tooling fixes to Linus ASAP.

Thanks,

	Ingo