Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/146] 4.4.16-stable review
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Jul 27 2016 - 00:42:33 EST
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:55:35PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > stable-rc boot: 353 boots: 7 failed, 345 passed with 1 offline (v4.4.15-147-g0b4b25c69607)
> >
> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.15-147-g0b4b25c69607/
> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.15-147-g0b4b25c69607/
> >
> > Tree: stable-rc
> > Branch: local/linux-4.4.y
> > Git Describe: v4.4.15-147-g0b4b25c69607
> > Git Commit: 0b4b25c69607c7515308f6a2beb6120dec2ad9dc
> > Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > Tested: 64 unique boards, 17 SoC families, 27 builds out of 140
> >
> > Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.4.15-147-g0b4b25c69607&fail
> >
> > arm64:
> >
> > defconfig:
> > apm-mustang-kvm-guest: 1 failed lab
> > apm-mustang-kvm-uefi-guest: 1 failed lab
> > juno-kvm-guest: 1 failed lab
> > juno-kvm-uefi-guest: 1 failed lab
>
> Can be ignored. KVM issues with the qemu on the rootfs, under
> investigation.
>
> > arm:
> >
> > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
> > sun9i-a80-optimus: 1 failed lab
> >
> > sunxi_defconfig:
> > sun9i-a80-optimus: 1 failed lab
> >
> > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
> > sun9i-a80-optimus: 1 failed lab
>
> These ones look legit.
>
> I've asked the folks in the Free Electrons lab to have a closer look at
> this one.
Ok, thanks, let me know if they find I messed anything up.
greg k-h