Re: [PATCH V1] documentation: da9052: Update regulator bindings names to match DA9052/53 DTS expectations

From: Rob Herring
Date: Wed Jul 27 2016 - 10:52:04 EST


On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:20:54PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:
> From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi Mark,

Drop this from the commit msg.

>
> Buck and LDO binding name changes.
>
> The binding names for the regulators have been changed to match the current
> expectation from existing device tree source files.
>
> This fix rectifies the disparity between what currently exists in some
> .dts[i] board files and what is listed in this binding document. This
> change re-aligns those differences and also brings the binding document
> in-line with the expectations of the product datasheet from Dialog
> Semiconductor.
>
> Bucks and LDOs now follow the expected notation:
> { buck1, buck2, buck3, buck4 }
> { ldo1, ldo2, ldo3, ldo4, ldo5, ldo6, ldo7, ldo8, ldo9, ldo10 }
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> This patch applies against linux-next and v4.7
>
> Hi,
>
> Several device tree source files use a regulator naming scheme different to
> that found in the binding text document. Since those have been used
> already, I would like ensure to the binding document follows those existing
> DT file naming conventions.
>
> Please refer to the files containing da9052/53 references:
> - ./arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-voipac-dmm-668.dtsi
> - ./arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-qsb.dts
>
> Those board files use the naming convention:
> { buck1, buck2, buck3, buck4 }
> { ldo1, ldo2, ldo3, ldo4, ldo5, ldo6, ldo7, ldo8, ldo9, ldo10 }
>
> Instead of the existing suggestion in the device tree binding file:
> { buck0, buck1, buck2, buck3 }
> { ldo4, ldo5, ldo6, ldo7, ldo8, ldo9, ldo10, ldo11, ldo12, ldo13 }
>
> The binding file regulator names (as it stands) does not reflect any
> real-world uses I can find. This change would bring it in-line with
> currect expectations from existing DTS files and make it similar enough to
> the product datasheets to be "less confusing" than it currently is.
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> See reference:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/25/197
>
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/da9052-i2c.txt | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Otherwise,

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>