RE: [RFC] regulator: da9052/53: da9052-i2c.txt binding document changes

From: Steve Twiss
Date: Thu Jul 28 2016 - 04:26:39 EST

On 27 July 2016 19:24, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:31:27AM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > There are already several device tree files using a naming scheme different to that found
> > in the binding text document. Since those have been used for real already, I will just follow
> > those existing DT file naming conventions instead.
> The other thing you can try to do here is have a -v2 binding with the
> corrected names that's easier for people to follow though it does make
> the implementation more complex and may not be worth it.

Yes, I think it would be overly complicated to have a -v2 compatible option in this case.