Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant

From: Julian Calaby
Date: Thu Jul 28 2016 - 06:25:10 EST


Hi All,

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The X-Powers AXP813 PMIC is close enough to the AXP809 with some
> more outputs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 32 ++++++++-
> drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c | 1 +
> drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 3 +
> drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 38 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> index 6d9ac76..c3287c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> @@ -467,7 +543,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * name.
> */
> if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
> - (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
> + (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW) ||
> + (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DC1SW)) {

Are we getting to the point now where we need some other way to flag
these? Maybe a set of flags per regulator?

> new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*desc),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> *new_desc = regulators[i];
> @@ -505,7 +582,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * Save AXP22X DCDC1 / DCDC5 regulator names for later.
> */
> if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC1) ||
> - (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1))
> + (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1) ||
> + (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DCDC1))

Ditto.

> of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
> "regulator-name",
> &dcdc1_name);

Thanks,

--
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/