Re: [PATCH v16 6/6] ARM: socfpga: fpga bridge driver support
From: atull
Date: Thu Jul 28 2016 - 11:26:20 EST
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Andrea Galbusera wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Trent Piepho <tpiepho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 15:30 -0600, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Supports Altera SOCFPGA bridges:
> >> * fpga2sdram
> >> * fpga2hps
> >> * hps2fpga
> >> * lwhps2fpga
> >>
> >> Allows enabling/disabling the bridges through the FPGA
> >> Bridge Framework API functions.
> >
> > I'm replying to v16 because it exists on gmane, while v17 appears not
> > to. lkml.org's forward feature appears to be broken so I can't reply to
> > that message (no way to get message-id). But v17 of this patch should
> > be the same. If a v18 was posted, I've not been able to find it.
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/altera-hps2fpga.c b/drivers/fpga/altera-hps2fpga.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..c15df47
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/fpga/altera-hps2fpga.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * FPGA to/from HPS Bridge Driver for Altera SoCFPGA Devices
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Altera Corporation, All Rights Reserved.
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> >> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> >> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> >> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> >> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> >> + * more details.
> >> + *
> >> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
> >> + * this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * This driver manages bridges on a Altera SOCFPGA between the ARM host
> >> + * processor system (HPS) and the embedded FPGA.
> >> + *
> >> + * This driver supports enabling and disabling of the configured ports, which
> >> + * allows for safe reprogramming of the FPGA, assuming that the new FPGA image
> >> + * uses the same port configuration. Bridges must be disabled before
> >> + * reprogramming the FPGA and re-enabled after the FPGA has been programmed.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> >> +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-bridge.h>
> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> >> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> >> +
> >> +#define ALT_L3_REMAP_OFST 0x0
> >> +#define ALT_L3_REMAP_MPUZERO_MSK 0x00000001
> >> +#define ALT_L3_REMAP_H2F_MSK 0x00000008
> >> +#define ALT_L3_REMAP_LWH2F_MSK 0x00000010
> >> +
> >> +#define HPS2FPGA_BRIDGE_NAME "hps2fpga"
> >> +#define LWHPS2FPGA_BRIDGE_NAME "lwhps2fpga"
> >> +#define FPGA2HPS_BRIDGE_NAME "fpga2hps"
> >> +
> >> +struct altera_hps2fpga_data {
> >> + const char *name;
> >> + struct reset_control *bridge_reset;
> >> + struct regmap *l3reg;
> >> + /* The L3 REMAP register is write only, so keep a cached value. */
> >> + unsigned int l3_remap_value;
> >> + unsigned int remap_mask;
> >> + struct clk *clk;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static int alt_hps2fpga_enable_show(struct fpga_bridge *bridge)
> >> +{
> >> + struct altera_hps2fpga_data *priv = bridge->priv;
> >> +
> >> + return reset_control_status(priv->bridge_reset);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int _alt_hps2fpga_enable_set(struct altera_hps2fpga_data *priv,
> >> + bool enable)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* bring bridge out of reset */
> >> + if (enable)
> >> + ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->bridge_reset);
> >> + else
> >> + ret = reset_control_assert(priv->bridge_reset);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* Allow bridge to be visible to L3 masters or not */
> >> + if (priv->remap_mask) {
> >> + priv->l3_remap_value |= ALT_L3_REMAP_MPUZERO_MSK;
> >
> > Doesn't seem like this belongs here. I realize the write-only register
> > is a problem. Maybe the syscon driver should be initializing this
> > value?
> >
> >> +
> >> + if (enable)
> >> + priv->l3_remap_value |= priv->remap_mask;
> >> + else
> >> + priv->l3_remap_value &= ~priv->remap_mask;
> >> +
> >> + ret = regmap_write(priv->l3reg, ALT_L3_REMAP_OFST,
> >> + priv->l3_remap_value);
> >
> > This isn't going work if more than one bridge is used. Each bridge has
> > its own priv and thus priv->l3_remap_value. Each bridge's priv will
> > have just the bit for it's own remap set. The 2nd bridge to be enabled
> > will turn off the 1st bridge when it re-write the l3 register.
>
> I can confirm this is exactly what happens with tag
> "rel_socfpga-4.1.22-ltsi_16.06.02_pr" of socfpga-4.1.22-ltsi branch
> from altera-opensource/linux-socfpga which includes more or less the
> code in this patch. If you have 2 bridges (lw-hps2fpga and hps2fpga)
> you end up with only one of them being visible. Easily spot by logging
> l3_remap_value being passed to regmap_write()...
>
Anatolij kindly provided a patch for this issue. I'll push it
to my github repo when I can.
Alan
---