Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix seccomp for UM (next)

[James Morris]

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:56 PM, MickaÃl SalaÃn <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This series fix the recent seccomp update for the User-mode Linux architecture
> >> (32-bit and 64-bit) since commit 26703c636c1f3272b39bd0f6d04d2e970984f1b6
> >> (close the hole where ptrace can change a syscall out from under seccomp).
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> MickaÃl SalaÃn (3):
> >>   um/ptrace: Fix the syscall_trace_leave call
> >>   um/ptrace: Fix the syscall number update after a ptrace
> >>   seccomp: Remove 2-phase API documentation
> >>
> >>  arch/Kconfig                  | 11 -----------
> >>  arch/um/kernel/skas/syscall.c | 10 +++-------
> >>  arch/x86/um/ptrace_32.c       |  3 +++
> >>  arch/x86/um/ptrace_64.c       |  4 ++++
> >>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > Ah, perfect! Thanks for fixing this! James, can you pick this up for -next?
> >
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> James, can you take these fixes for v4.8? We'll need them for um to
> work correctly again. (They appear to still be missing from -next.)
> 

I'm pretty sure I don't have these patches, can you or the author send 
them to me?

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>