Re: [PATCH 00/13] arm64: Allwinner A64 support based on sunxi-ng
From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Mon Aug 01 2016 - 08:02:25 EST
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:13:34 +0800
> Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> > But I don't see why you are keeping the simple-gates. The bus gate may
>> > be ungated/gated when the clock is enabled/disabled, and that's what
>> > Allwinner's software does.
>>
>> For peripherals that have a separate mod clock, having them separate
>> is a good thing. One example might be the audio codecs. You could ungate
>> the bus gate to access its registers to program it, but only enable
>> the mod clock when you actually play something.
>
> The roles of the bus gate and the clock gate are the same. I don't see
> any reason to set one gate without setting the other one. More, the
> spec says what the bus gate must be enabled before the clock gate (and
> reverse order while disabling). So, setting both gates in one function
> call seems safer.
Wha? Aren't bus gates and clock gates the same thing in this context?
ChenYu
> Then, if you want to save some power while not playing anything, just do
> clk_disable() of the (main and only) i2s clock.
>
> --
> Ken ar c'hentaà | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
> Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/