[PATCH 0566/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Baole Ni]

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/media/tuners/tuner-simple.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-simple.c b/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-simple.c
index 8e9ce14..7218a7e 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/tuner-simple.c
@@ -14,22 +14,22 @@
 #include "tuner-simple.h"
 
 static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable verbose debug messages");
 
 #define TUNER_SIMPLE_MAX 64
 static unsigned int simple_devcount;
 
 static int offset;
-module_param(offset, int, 0664);
+module_param(offset, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(offset, "Allows to specify an offset for tuner");
 
 static unsigned int atv_input[TUNER_SIMPLE_MAX] = \
 			{ [0 ... (TUNER_SIMPLE_MAX-1)] = 0 };
 static unsigned int dtv_input[TUNER_SIMPLE_MAX] = \
 			{ [0 ... (TUNER_SIMPLE_MAX-1)] = 0 };
-module_param_array(atv_input, int, NULL, 0644);
-module_param_array(dtv_input, int, NULL, 0644);
+module_param_array(atv_input, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param_array(dtv_input, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(atv_input, "specify atv rf input, 0 for autoselect");
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(dtv_input, "specify dtv rf input, 0 for autoselect");
 
-- 
2.9.2