Re: [PATCH] raid5: fix incorrectly counter of conf->empty_inactive_list_nr

[NeilBrown]

On Wed, Aug 03 2016, liuzhengyuan wrote:

> Thanks for you replay.
> I think it may be on the temp inactive list. An active sh was handled
> and put to temp inactive list firstly, then moved to inactive list.
> If sh is on the temp inactive list,  sh->count is zero too.

Hmmm... yes, you are probably right.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature