Re: [RFC 2/4] bpf, security: Add Checmate

[zhuyj]

 Sure.
Is it better to add
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU ?

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Please do not top post
>
> On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 16:08 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>>  +void register_checmate_prog_ops(void);
>> maybe it is extern void register_checmate_prog_ops(void);?
>>
>> +       preempt_disable();
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>> IMHO, it is not necessary to use the above 2 since rcu_read_lock will
>> call preempt_disable.
>
> You might double check if this claim is true if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
>
>
>