Re: next build: 143 builds: 1 failed, 142 passed, 1 error, 22 warnings (next-20160801)

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi George,

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:57 PM, George Spelvin
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Warnings:
>>>     lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
>>>     lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef]
>>>     lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef]
>>>     lib/test_hash.c:146:2: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
>>>     lib/test_hash.c:146:2: warning: (near initialization for 'hash_or[0]') [-Wmissing-braces]
>
>> Upgrading to gcc-4.9 will fix avoid that, and a couple of workarounds have
>> been discussed before, but I don't know why none of them got merged.
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven was the first to find this problem and propose a
> patch, which I acked, and thought it was going in via the m68k tree.
> Helge Deller did the same a couple days later, and I told him not to
> bother because Geert had taken care of it.
>
> Here are the patches:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146454366031110
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146454366131111
>
> Perhaps there was some confusion about whose version was going in, or
> via which tree.  Maybe I was wrong to assume Geert was putting them in
> the m68k tree.

As these patches were meant for generic non-m68k code, I didn't plan
to take them
through my tree.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds