Re: [PATCH] priority improvement

From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Thu Aug 04 2016 - 17:21:39 EST



Please, ignore it
It was sent by mistake

On 05.08.16 00:11, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 9ddaccc..cd12f52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -788,22 +788,16 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget)
{
struct cpsw_priv *priv = napi_to_priv(napi_tx);
int num_tx, ch;
- u32 ch_map;
+ unsigned long ch_map;

/* process every unprocessed channel */
- ch_map = cpdma_ctrl_txchs_state(priv->dma);
- for (ch = 0, num_tx = 0; num_tx < budget; ch_map >>= 1, ch++) {
- if (!ch_map) {
- ch_map = cpdma_ctrl_txchs_state(priv->dma);
- if (!ch_map)
- break;
-
- ch = 0;
- }
-
- if (!(ch_map & 0x01))
- continue;
+ for (num_tx = 0; num_tx < budget;) {
+ ch_map = cpdma_ctrl_txchs_state(priv->dma);
+ if (!ch_map)
+ break;

+ /* process beginning from higher priority queue */
+ ch = __fls(ch_map);
num_tx += cpdma_chan_process(priv->txch[ch], budget - num_tx);
}

@@ -829,19 +823,13 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget)
u32 ch_map;

/* process every unprocessed channel */
- ch_map = cpdma_ctrl_rxchs_state(priv->dma);
- for (ch = 0, num_rx = 0; num_rx < budget; ch_map >>= 1, ch++) {
- if (!ch_map) {
- ch_map = cpdma_ctrl_rxchs_state(priv->dma);
- if (!ch_map)
- break;
-
- ch = 0;
- }
-
- if (!(ch_map & 0x01))
- continue;
+ for (num_rx = 0; num_rx < budget;) {
+ ch_map = cpdma_ctrl_rxchs_state(priv->dma);
+ if (!ch_map)
+ break;

+ /* process beginning from higher priority queue */
+ ch = __fls(ch_map);
num_rx += cpdma_chan_process(priv->rxch[ch], budget - num_rx);
}

@@ -1130,8 +1118,11 @@ cpsw_tx_queue_mapping(struct cpsw_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
unsigned int q_idx = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);

- if (q_idx >= priv->tx_ch_num)
- q_idx = q_idx % priv->tx_ch_num;
+ /* cpsw h/w has backward order queue priority, 7 - highest */
+ if (likely(q_idx < priv->tx_ch_num))
+ q_idx = priv->tx_ch_num - q_idx - 1;
+ else
+ q_idx = 0;

return priv->txch[q_idx];
}


--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk