[PATCH v2 12/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix int dbg message
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Sat Aug 06 2016 - 17:40:53 EST
While poll handlers there is no possibility to figure out
which network device is handling packets, as cpdma channels
are common for both network devices in dual_emac mode. Currently,
the messages are printed only for one device, in fact, there is two.
So, better to print integrated num_tx value for both devices if
any of them is allowed to.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 29ff489..395531d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ struct cpsw_common {
bool rx_irq_disabled;
bool tx_irq_disabled;
u32 irqs_table[IRQ_NUM];
+ int intr_dbg_msg;
};
struct cpsw_priv {
@@ -802,7 +803,9 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget)
}
}
- cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx);
+ if (cpsw->intr_dbg_msg && net_ratelimit())
+ dev_dbg(cpsw->dev, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx);
+
return num_tx;
}
@@ -822,7 +825,9 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget)
}
}
- cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx);
+ if (cpsw->intr_dbg_msg && net_ratelimit())
+ dev_dbg(cpsw->dev, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_rx);
+
return num_rx;
}
@@ -1848,8 +1853,35 @@ static u32 cpsw_get_msglevel(struct net_device *ndev)
static void cpsw_set_msglevel(struct net_device *ndev, u32 value)
{
+ int i;
+ struct cpsw_priv *sl_priv;
struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
+
priv->msg_enable = value;
+
+ /* There is no possibility to at napi poll level
+ * to know which netdev is handled, so enable
+ * common dbg msg print if any interface is enabled to
+ */
+ cpsw->intr_dbg_msg = 0;
+ if (!cpsw->data.dual_emac) {
+ if (netif_msg_intr(priv))
+ cpsw->intr_dbg_msg = 1;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cpsw->data.slaves; i++) {
+ ndev = netdev_priv(cpsw->slaves[i].ndev);
+ if (!ndev)
+ continue;
+
+ sl_priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ if (netif_msg_intr(sl_priv)) {
+ cpsw->intr_dbg_msg = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
}
static int cpsw_get_ts_info(struct net_device *ndev,
--
1.9.1