Re: [PACTH v4 1/2] usb: xhci: plat: Enable runtime PM
From: kbuild test robot
Date: Tue Aug 09 2016 - 12:24:21 EST
Hi Robert,
[auto build test WARNING on usb/usb-testing]
[also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc1 next-20160809]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/robert-foss-collabora-com/usb-xhci-plat-Enable-PM-async-resume-suspend/20160809-234302
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git usb-testing
config: i386-randconfig-s0-201632 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c: In function 'xhci_plat_suspend':
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:303:2: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if (ret < 0)
^~
drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:305:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
return ret;
^~~~~~
drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c: In function 'xhci_plat_resume':
drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:327:2: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if (ret < 0)
^~
drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:329:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if'
return ret;
^~~~~~
vim +/if +303 drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c
287
288 if (!IS_ERR(clk))
289 clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
290 usb_put_hcd(hcd);
291
292 return 0;
293 }
294
295 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
296 static int xhci_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
297 {
298 struct usb_hcd *hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
299 struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
300 int ret;
301
302 ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> 303 if (ret < 0)
304 atomic_dec(&dev->power.usage_count);
305 return ret;
306 /*
307 * xhci_suspend() needs `do_wakeup` to know whether host is allowed
308 * to do wakeup during suspend. Since xhci_plat_suspend is currently
309 * only designed for system suspend, device_may_wakeup() is enough
310 * to dertermine whether host is allowed to do wakeup. Need to
311 * reconsider this when xhci_plat_suspend enlarges its scope, e.g.,
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: Binary data