Re: [RFC PATCH v7 1/7] Restartable sequences system call
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Aug 10 2016 - 15:15:41 EST
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:26:04PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> static bool rseq_update_cpu_id_event_counter(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> union rseq_cpu_event u;
>
> u.e.cpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id();
> u.e.event_counter = ++t->rseq_event_counter;
> if (__put_user(u.v, &t->rseq->u.v))
> return false;
> trace_rseq_inc(t->rseq_event_counter);
I had not previously noticed the trace_* muck, but I would suggest
passing in t and leaving it up to the tracepoint implementation to pick
out the value.
Also, since this not only increments (it also updates the cpu number)
the naming is 'wrong'.
> return true;
> }