Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] usb: chipidea: let chipidea core device of_node equal's glue layer device of_node
From: Peter Chen
Date: Wed Aug 10 2016 - 16:13:40 EST
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:00:15AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
> Hi, Peter
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-usb-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-usb-
> > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Chen
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:12 AM
> > To: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > sre@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx; dwmw3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pawel.moll@xxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> > linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; troy.kisky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > festevam@xxxxxxxxx; oscar@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > stillcompiling@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] usb: chipidea: let chipidea core device
> > of_node equal's glue layer device of_node
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:15:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-08-08 01:52:10)
> > > > From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > At device tree, we have no device node for chipidea core, the glue
> > > > layer's node is the parent node for host and udc device. But in
> > > > related driver, the parent device is chipidea core. So, in order to
> > > > let the common driver get parent's node, we let the core's device
> > > > node equals glue layer device node.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Tested-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Tested-by Joshua Clayton <stillcompiling@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c index 69426e6..b189dc7 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
> > > > @@ -954,6 +954,15 @@ static int ci_hdrc_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > > > dev_err(dev, "unable to init phy: %d\n", ret);
> > > > return ret;
> > > > }
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * At device tree, we have no device node for chipidea core,
> > > > + * the glue layer's node is the parent node for host and udc
> > > > + * device. But in related driver, the parent device is
> > chipidea
> > > > + * core. So, in order to let the common driver get parent's
> > node,
> > > > + * we let the core's device node equals glue layer's node.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (dev->parent && dev->parent->of_node)
> > > > + dev->of_node = dev->parent->of_node;
> > >
> > > Can this be done earlier? Perhaps after hw_device_init() in this probe
> > > routine? That would allow me to remove the awkward parent searching in
> > > my ULPI DT awareness patch.
> >
> > The reason why I locate it there is to avoid "goto label" for error path
> > during PHY's get and initialization operation.
> >
> > Ok, to simplify your work, I will change it at next version.
>
> As iommu need this to be done even more earlier, will you consider to
> put it before adding the core's platform device?
>
I can't do it, it will introduce another issue that the pinctrl has
already requested by parents. The warning is similar like below, but
occurs at the probe.
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1607.2/03150.html
I will see how iommu support can be added for platform devices which
are created by runtime (like chipidea core device).
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen