Re: [Urgent PATCH] arm64: dts: uniphier: fix IRQ trigger type of ARMv8 timer

[Masahiro Yamada]

Hi Arnd,

2016-08-01 17:26 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Marc,
>
> 2016-08-01 17:18 GMT+09:00 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>:
>> Please keep me cc-ed on this.
>
> Sorry, I automate patch-posting, but scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> did not pick you up.  Also, I forgot to cc you explicitly.
>
>
>> On 01/08/16 09:12, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> Since commit 1e2a7d78499e ("irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping
>>> an IRQ"), the interrupt type is strictly checked.  Without this
>>> patch, this board would not boot any more.
>>>
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.txt
>>> says that the 3rd cell should be either 1 (edge) or 4 (level)
>>> depending on the trigger type.  As the CA72 Generic Timer provides
>>> active-low interrupts, the value of the 3rd cell should be 4.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Arnd, Olof,
>>>
>>> I guess you are about to send pull-reqs for v4.8 cycle.
>>> Could you include this one in them?
>>> After IRQ updates for 4.8 were merged, my board would not
>>> boot at all.  I consulted experts and looks like my DT
>>> was wrong.
>>>
>>> I could do this after -rc1 is out because it is apparently a
>>> bug fix, but in that case the for-next branch in ASOC will be
>>> broken for me, which would make bisect-ability difficult for me.
>>
>> I have a patch that addresses all platforms in one go (there is really
>> no point in fixing one at a time for a bug that is so widespread).
>>
>> I'll repost it later today.
>>
>
> That'll be fine.
> Thank you!
>
>
> Arnd, Olof:
> Please disregard this one.
>

Oh Dear.
Did you apply this one?

This was replaced with Marc'one:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9254183/


Is it too late?


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada