Re: [PATCH 05/19] arm64: rename COMPAT to AARCH32_EL0 in Kconfig

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday, August 11, 2016 3:35:01 PM CEST Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> On 2016/6/18 7:54, Yury Norov wrote:
> > From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In this patchset  ILP32 ABI support is added. Additionally to AARCH32,
> > which is binary-compatible with ARM, ILP32 is (mostly) ABI-compatible.
> >
> >  From now, AARCH32_EL0 (former COMPAT) config option means the support of
> > AARCH32 userspace, ARM64_ILP32 - support of ILP32 ABI (see next patches),
> > and COMPAT indicates that one of them, or both, is enabled.
> >
> > Where needed, CONFIG_COMPAT is changed over to use CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0 instead
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> > index c173d32..af200a8 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> > @@ -134,15 +134,17 @@ static int c_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >   		 */
> >   		seq_puts(m, "Features\t:");
> >   		if (compat) {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > -			for (j = 0; compat_hwcap_str[j]; j++)
> > -				if (compat_elf_hwcap & (1 << j))
> > -					seq_printf(m, " %s", compat_hwcap_str[j]);
> > -
> > -			for (j = 0; compat_hwcap2_str[j]; j++)
> > -				if (compat_elf_hwcap2 & (1 << j))
> > -					seq_printf(m, " %s", compat_hwcap2_str[j]);
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0
> I saw that compat_hwcap_str and compat_hwcap2_str is defined when
> "CONFIG_COMPAT" is true. Why we only change it to CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0
> in c show()?
> > +			if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32) {
> And "compat" is "personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32;",
> it seems that there is no need to add this twice.

I think it would be best to remove the #ifdef here completely,
the PER_LINUX32 concept is not strictly tied to the emulation
of ARM binaries, it literally just changes the output of
/proc/cpuinfo and 'uname', and you can have ARM binaries with
PER_LINUX (using the arm64 uname) just like you can have
arm64 binaries running with PER_LINUX32.

	Arnd