Re: [Regression] "irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping an IRQ" breaks nexus7 gpio buttons

[John Stultz]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/08/16 10:47, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 11/08/16 09:37, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 08/08/16 22:48, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 1:45 AM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -614,7 +615,11 @@ unsigned int irq_create_fwspec_mapping(struct
>>>>> irq_fwspec *fwspec)
>>>>>                  * it now and return the interrupt number.
>>>>>                  */
>>>>>                 if (irq_get_trigger_type(virq) == IRQ_TYPE_NONE) {
>>>>> -                       irq_set_irq_type(virq, type);
>>>>> +                       irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
>>>>> +                       if (!irq_data)
>>>>> +                               return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +                       irqd_set_trigger_type(irq_data, type);
>>>>>                         return virq;
>>>>>                 }
>>>>>
>>>>> If I revert just that, it works again.
>>>>
>>>> This makes my platform work too.
>>>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Hmmm. I'm now booting your kernel on the APQ8060, and reverting this
>>> hunk doesn't fix it for me. I'm confused...
>>>
>>> The interesting part is this:
>>> 109:     100000          0   msmgpio  88 Level     (null)
>>
>> 88 is the pm8058 parent interrupt and so I am surprised you would even
>> see this in /proc/interrupts as it should be a chained interrupt, right?
>>
>> Are you seeing this with all the ethernet updates for the APQ8060 in
>> Linus' branch? I am curious what you see with stock v4.8-rc1 and if
>> interrupts work ok with the change I had proposed. Hard to tell if there
>> is more than one issue here.
>
> Nailed the sucker:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index b4c1bc7..9d7284a 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -820,6 +820,18 @@ __irq_do_set_handler(struct irq_desc *desc, irq_flow_handler_t handle,
>         desc->name = name;
>
>         if (handle != handle_bad_irq && is_chained) {
> +               int ret;
> +
> +               ret = __irq_set_trigger(desc,
> +                                       irqd_get_trigger_type(&desc->irq_data));
> +               WARN_ON(ret);
> +               /*
> +                * This is beyond ugly: .set_type may have overridden
> +                * the flow, not not knowing that we're dealing with a
> +                * chained handler. Reset it here because we know
> +                * better.
> +                */
> +               desc->handle_irq = handle;
>                 irq_settings_set_noprobe(desc);
>                 irq_settings_set_norequest(desc);
>                 irq_settings_set_nothread(desc);
>
> Linus, Jon: Can you please confirm this fixes your respective issues?

Yep. That works for me!

Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks so much for hunting this down!
-john