Re: [RFC 2/4] dma-buf/fence: kerneldoc: remove spurious section header

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:17:58PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> Commit e941759c74a44d6ac2eed21bb0a38b21fe4559e2 ("fence: dma-buf
> cross-device synchronization (v18)") had a spurious kerneldoc section
> header that caused Sphinx to complain. Fix it.
> 
> Fixes: e941759c74a4 ("fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v18)")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>

On patches 1&2 Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  include/linux/fence.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fence.h b/include/linux/fence.h
> index 5aa95eb886f7..5de89dab0013 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fence.h
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ struct fence_cb;
>   * implementer of the fence for its own purposes. Can be used in different
>   * ways by different fence implementers, so do not rely on this.
>   *
> - * *) Since atomic bitops are used, this is not guaranteed to be the case.
> + * Since atomic bitops are used, this is not guaranteed to be the case.
>   * Particularly, if the bit was set, but fence_signal was called right
>   * before this bit was set, it would have been able to set the
>   * FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, before enable_signaling was called.
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch