Re: [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes

[John Stultz]

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Pratyush Patel
<pratyushpatel.1995@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index e99df0f..c7f6f5b 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void clock_was_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  static DECLARE_WORK(hrtimer_work, clock_was_set_work);
>
>  /*
> - * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogramm the hrtimer
> + * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogram the hrtimer
>   * interrupt device on all cpus.
>   */
>  void clock_was_set_delayed(void)
> @@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
>
>         /*
>          * Note: We clear the running state after enqueue_hrtimer and
> -        * we do not reprogramm the event hardware. Happens either in
> +        * we do not reprogram the event hardware. Happens either in
>          * hrtimer_start_range_ns() or in hrtimer_interrupt()
>          *
>          * Note: Because we dropped the cpu_base->lock above,
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Queued. Thanks for sending this.

thanks
-john