Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] /dev/random - a new approach
From: Herbert Xu
Date: Fri Aug 19 2016 - 01:57:29 EST
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:49:47PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> That really depends on the system. We can't assume that people are
> using systems with a 100Hz clock interrupt. More often than not
> people are using tickless kernels these days. That's actually the
> problem with changing /dev/urandom to block until things are
> initialized.
Couldn't we disable tickless until urandom has been seeded? In fact
perhaps we should accelerate the timer interrupt rate until it has
been seeded?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt