Re: [PACTH v2 0/3] Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps
From: Minchan Kim
Date: Mon Aug 22 2016 - 10:13:06 EST
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:40:52AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 22-08-16 09:07:45, Minchan Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > #!/bin/sh
> > ./smap_test &
> > pid=$!
> >
> > for i in $(seq 25)
> > do
> > awk '/^Rss/{rss+=$2} /^Pss/{pss+=$2} END {}' \
> > /proc/$pid/smaps
> > done
> > kill $pid
> >
> > root@bbox:/home/barrios/test/smap# time ./s.sh
> > pid:21973
> >
> > real 0m17.812s
> > user 0m12.612s
> > sys 0m5.187s
>
> retested on the bare metal (x86_64 - 2CPUs)
> Command being timed: "sh s.sh"
> User time (seconds): 0.00
> System time (seconds): 18.08
> Percent of CPU this job got: 98%
> Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 0:18.29
>
> multiple runs are quite consistent in those numbers. I am running with
> $ awk --version
> GNU Awk 4.1.3, API: 1.1 (GNU MPFR 3.1.4, GNU MP 6.1.0)
>
> > > like a problem we are not able to address. And I would even argue that
> > > we want to address it in a generic way as much as possible.
> >
> > Sure. What solution do you think as generic way?
>
> either optimize seq_printf or replace it with something faster.
If it's real culprit, I agree. However, I tested your test program on
my 2 x86 machines and my friend's machine.
Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch
They have awk 4.0.1 and 4.1.3.
Result are same. Userspace speand more times I mentioned.
[root@blaptop smap_test]# time awk '/^Rss/{rss+=$2} /^Pss/{pss+=$2} END {printf "rss:%d pss:%d\n", rss, pss}' /proc/3552/smaps
rss:263484 pss:262188
real 0m0.770s
user 0m0.574s
sys 0m0.197s
I will attach my test progrma source.
I hope you guys test and repost the result because it's the key for direction
of patchset.
Thanks.
#include <sys/mman.h>
int main()
{
unsigned long nr_vma = 0;
while (1) {
if (mmap(0, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED|MAP_POPULATE, -1, 0) == MAP_FAILED)
break;
nr_vma++;
};
printf("pid:%d nr_vma:%lu\n", getpid(), nr_vma);
pause();
return 0;
}