Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number

[Sean Paul]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Mark yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2016å08æ23æ 04:30, Sean Paul wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016å08æ18æ 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are
>>>>>> deprecated,
>>>>>> I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon.
>>>>
>>>> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream
>>>> patches
>>>> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with
>>>> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development.
>>>> -Daniel
>>>>
>>> Yeah, Sorry for that.
>>>
>>> In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399
>>> patches are based on them,
>>> but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches,  Sean's patches
>>> is
>>> old version.
>>>
>>> I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to
>>> upstream.
>>> but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) .
>>>
>>> merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches.
>>>
>> Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then?
>> Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that
>> depends on these changes.
>>
>> Sean
>
> Yes, But I miss your [PATCH v3 0/5] and [PATCH v3 4/5]. do you mean the lost
> patches use v2 version?
>

Yes, v2 4/5 was reviewed as-is, so I just applied it.

Sean

>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ïark Yao
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ïark Yao
>
>