Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct
From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Tue Aug 23 2016 - 17:16:15 EST
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes it trivial to constify them, so do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks good. Could you rebase to i2c/for-next?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature